Garmin Oregon 550t — Picture Perfect?
In a nutshell, so far so good.
I think back to the first weeks (or months?) after the releases of the Garmin Colorado and Oregon and I never would have left home without a backup GPS. This past week I traveled many miles with my Garmin Oregon 550t by car, by boat and on foot and, for the most part, it worked flawlessly. No backup necessary.
There are a few minor issues I’ve run across:
- Compass calibration failures and a couple of times the compass has just started spinning, requiring a reset. This is probably the most serious issue.
- When you get near the maximum limit of 5000 geocaches, some caches aren’t previewed properly on the map page.
- Minor autorouting and autoroute recalculation issues.
- Small issues in the Route Planner building routes.
I’m slowly adding these to the Issues List on the Oregon wiki. If you search the Issues List for “[x50]” you’ll find all of the bugs associated with the Oregon 550 and 550t.
Aside from the new features I noted in my first impressions post the GPS has functioned and behaved like an Oregon 400t, it has all of the same features and most of the same flaws as its predecessor.
The camera and geotagging support has been working superbly. Several people have asked about macro shots and shutter lag. I’ve been able to focus on objects within 2″-3″ and get very clear photos. I’ve posted some more untouched images in the album below. The shutter lag is good, probably in the 300ms-500ms range if auto-focus has been activated and you are only releasing the shutter, you’ll see closer to 1 to 2 seconds of lag if you haven’t already set the auto-focus.
Integrated geotagging is much more handy than I ever imagined. It comes down to this: every time I used to mark a waypoint, I now take a picture instead. Over the course of the weekend I used geotagging to share the location of a trailhead with a friend, show a perspective homebuyer a photo (with embedded location) of a house for sale which included the realtor’s contact information, capture the damage to a geocache container to remind myself which cache it was based on the geotagged location and archive images containing the coordinates and clues for a multi-cache. I’ve geotagged using ExpertGPS and other tools by time correlating my photos with my GPS tracks but the convenience of having the geotagging done by the GPS and available in the field is what makes this a feature I will continue to depend on regularly. I still have not been able to test the photo upload to myGarmin but Garmin tells me this should be ready on their site very soon.
The camera does draw down batteries quickly. I’ve noticed that my battery life is significantly lower with camera use than without. I’ve run a head to head battery test between the 400t and 550t with the compasses and camera disabled and the two have identical battery life — around 10 hours on 2700mAh batteries. Again I think this points the fact that electrically these GPSs are almost identical except for the compass, accelerometer and camera.
As far as the screen is concerned I do have a slight preference for the glossy 550t screen over the 400t’s matte screen. It takes a little more adjustment to see around the reflections but once you do it is easier to read. If you have seen a Colorado, I find the 550t very similar to that unit’s non-touchscreen display.
For the most part GPS reception works the same as the Oregon x00, and given that they share the same ST Cartesio chipset and antenna design that is not too surprising. If I hold them side-by-side they lock the same satellites with the same signal strength and the Oregon 550t has the same WAAS issues as the 400t. Receiver performance under tree cover continues to be the Achilles heel of the Oregon product line, in my opinion. If Garmin uses the same receiver on the Dakota, which I’m guessing they will, I hope they will have the incentive to work out their problems with the Cartesio since it impacts so many products in their outdoor GPS line.
UserDataSync has been both a useful feature and an annoyance. Neither BaseCamp nor ExpertGPS seem to deal with the changes completely. I haven’t tried the newest version of Mapsource but I would expect similar results. BaseCamp opens every gpx file on the 550 when it connects which is a really bad idea if you have a 5000 geocache gpx file loaded. BaseCamp also does not open and display the current tracklog automatically but it seems to deal with waypoints, routes and saved tracks pretty well. Photo integration is not available in BaseCamp either.
As for UserDataSync this is how it works in more detail:
- Waypoints created on the device are put in daily waypoint files in \Garmin\GPX. Changes made to the waypoints in these files using BaseCamp or any other software will be reflected on the unit after the next boot.
- Routes and Saved Tracks created on the unit work exactly the same except each route or track is put in its own file. Edits to these files also show up on the GPS.
- The current tracklog is saved in \Garmin\GPX\Current\current.gpx (like the Oregon x00), but routes and waypoints no longer show up there. This is a “read-0nly” copy of the tracklog, editing it has no effect on the tracklog in the 550.
- Software like Mapsource, BaseCamp and ExpertGPS can be used to place routes, geocaches, tracks and waypoints in gpx files under \Garmin\GPX. These objects show up on the handheld and can be edited or deleted (except for geocaches). Changes made on the handheld are visible in the original gpx file once in mass storage mode again.
The synchronization feature is nice except you end up with a lot of files in \Garmin\GPX and finding anything without the help of a software program is time consuming. Archiving data for a trip can involve searching and saving data out of three or four different files rather than one. My suggestion to Garmin is to make current.gpx backward compatible with the current generation of x00 Oregon’s at least for the purposes of getting waypoints, tracks and routes off the device so that you only need to look in one file. I haven’t found any issues with UserDataSync yet, but I’m guessing that there will be confusion and issues around how all of this works especially given the complexity of synchronization software and the fact that the mapping software, including Garmin’s own, does not support it yet.
Support for 5000 geocaches was another major attraction for me since that gives me almost a 50 mile radius that covers my normal travels during the course of a week. I thought it was working flawlessly until I started previewing the last several hundred geocaches in the file and they started showing up on the map in places that were over 5000 miles away. This issue has been submitted to Garmin and they are looking into it. How big is that 5000 geocache file? About 27MB with 5 logs per cache and it took the 550t about 1.5 minutes to digest the file on the first boot after loading the file. Subsequent reboots are fast, 16 seconds, which is identical to my 400t.
After nearly a week of use I’m happy to be able to recommend the Garmin Oregon 550t without having to worry much about any major issues like the original Oregon and Colorado. The new Oregon is not bug free but I think most people will find that it does nearly as well as the Oregon 300 and 400 and after a software release or two it will be on par with the older models. If you are already considering an Oregon, Colorado or Delorme PN-40 I would suggest taking a look. It does come at a hefty price tag but there is value in the additional features, particularly the 3.2MP camera with integrated geotagging.
I still have a few more items I’d like to test like battery life and USB transfer rates once I get the time, but I’m expecting a Dakota soon so the 550t will probably sit for a few days while I work on developing some impressions of the Dakota. If you’re a 550 owner you can keep tabs over at the Oregon wiki on the Issues List and Versions page. I’ll be sending out notices as new software releases become available and moderating discussions on the 550t.
If you do decide to take the plunge only a few retailers are shipping the 550 right now, but GPSNow comes highly recommended because of their excellent customer service. REI is also listing the 550 and 550t as in stock and you can’t beat their return policy. Amazon is advertising a 7/20 ship date for the 550t and the 550.
Related posts:






July 15th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
I hate it how they artificially limit things like number of geocaches. Sorry, but if it can support millions of POIs, they can do the same for caches.
It’s just like Photoshop Elements limiting the number of undos and Pro Tools limiting the number of tracks. Terrible business practice, but they get away with it because people are willing to pay more.
July 16th, 2009 at 5:57 am
Also seeing how better GPS-enabled mobile smart phones work than the Oregon in terms of user interface and operating performance; having also in mind that Oregons have trouble with GPS accuracy and having 16Mhz CPU (as seen from the diagnostics screen) seems like an insult in year 2009…
July 16th, 2009 at 5:59 am
And yeah – the quality of pictures is awful – lack of focus or sharpness in the macro ones, noise like hell in the third one – again compared to recent phones.
July 16th, 2009 at 6:27 am
Not sure I agree with that comparison.
Even though the Oregon has its problems with the GPS receiver, I’m comparing to the GPSMAP 60csx, not the typical smartphone which I’m pretty sure the Oregon would run circles around. And while I would agree that the user interface could be better the Oregon does not have a 16Mhz CPU, the ARM core in the Cartesio can run up to 333mhz and I’m sure it is probably running close to that in the Oregon.
As for the pictures most of mine have been in low light so they do have a fair amount of noise, again I don’t think they are any better or worse than the photos I’ve seen from a 3MP iPhone. The iPhone does have better exposure control I think but I see the same grainy photos under low light with that camera.
Keep in mind the other main difference between the Oregon and a typical smartphone. I can use the Oregon in rain, drop it in the water and use it down to -20F with my gloves on. I don’t think there are too many smartphones that can do that.
July 16th, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Once again, thanks for your updated reports!
While I am not yet ready to ditch my Nikons, the overall picture quality has been a pleasant surprise, especially for this type of device. When hiking, I put as much as possible, including normal pocket items, into my backpack or daypack. The one item I do keep handy is my GPS. With the 550, I can see getting pictures I might have otherwise passed up because of the necessity to stop and retrieve my camera. And, the geotagging feature is awesome!
One small issue I have encountered is an occasional freeze after doing a ‘Recently Found’ search. The unit successfully finds the location but freezes when trying to page back to the main menu. It doesn’t happen every time but is frequent enough that I think it is glitch of some type. It seems most likely to occur if the found location is on a map with heavy topographic detail (I am trying to repeat the problem right now and, for the life of me, it won’t do it). In any case, a short press of the power button quickly restarts the unit. I am not sure how this interacts with tracklog recording.
July 16th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
[...] from: Garmin Oregon 550t – Impressions after one week Share and [...]
July 16th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Thanks for the report John. I’ve tried to reproduce the recent finds issue but can’t. Do you know if this only happens on a particular type of object, like a waypoint or photo? I’ve seen problems where stale data gets stuck in recent finds causing problems like this (ie. a deleted waypoint or geocache).
July 16th, 2009 at 11:19 pm
I believe that was it Scott! I had edited the name of an old waypoint, but it continued to show up in the recent finds list with the old name. As it rotated down the list to the second or third page, the crashes ceased. I selected it for another search which brought it back to the top of the list and the freeze ups started again.
I cleared the recent finds list by performing a master reset. Is there another way to do that?
When I have a little more time, I will try to recreate the problem and report it to Garmin. In the meantime, thanks for the suggestion above and all your help.
John
July 17th, 2009 at 6:17 am
John,
I’ll try to reproduce with your suggestion above. Unfortunately there is no way to clear the Recent Finds list w/o a master reset — I’ve been asking for this feature since the Oregon first came out a year ago, esp. since previous Garmin GPS’s all had this feature.
-Scott
July 17th, 2009 at 7:28 am
Thanks, Scott, I had a look at the Cartesio chip and it seems it isn’t just the GPS-related hardwre as I thought but also LCD&touchsceen controller etc., which leaves me wondering what are these 16 Mhz shown…
July 17th, 2009 at 8:29 am
Those pictures are surprisingly good. Much better than by smartphone.
July 17th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
@gruhcho, that might be one of the clock frequencies which gets multiplied up to the CPU frequency or something required by the GPS
@maingray, they are grainy as gruhcho points out but that is because most of my shots have been early morning low light shots. I’ll try to get some that are during the day.
BTW, another user reported a nasty bug (or maybe it is intentional) on the 550t. GPX files are not loaded (waypoints or geocaches) from the SD drive. If you copy a file into [SD drive]:\Garmin\GPX the contents of these files do not show up on the Oregon 550t.
I’ve let Garmin know and I’ll wait to hear what they say but this might be a big deal for people who swap geocaching databases by carrying multiple cards.
-Scott
July 17th, 2009 at 6:28 pm
That’s it, Scott – you’ve pushed me over the edge. Order submitted… look forward to getting one of these in hand early next week.
July 21st, 2009 at 9:52 pm
Hi Scott / Fellow Garmin Enthusiasts-
Okay: My “First Impressions” are far, FAR from Picture Perfect. I can’t even get the device to recognize a USB connection, and go into Mass Storage mode.
That means I’m unable to install maps, or download waypoints/geocaches. In other words – this thing is less useful than an old eTrex Vista – except that it includes a camera.
I posted my woes on the Oregon wiki in the x550 section, here:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/message/view/Versions+x50/13282421
Have already submitted to Garmin support. Sure hope I didn’t just unpack a lemon!!
July 24th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
This may have been covered already but is Garmin still using USB on the new Oregon or have they finally moved on to USB II?
I’m right on the verge, but that slow connection drives me crazy…
July 24th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
The 550 supports USB 2.0. The downloads are faster than the 400t.
-Scott
July 26th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Neither Mapsource nor BaseCamp will download new waypoints created in the 550t. Message is – device has no waypoints. This is true for the device memory per se and for for SD cards. This is a real problem. If waypoints are created in the field, they should be able to be transferred later to maps on the PC. Have discussed at length with Garmin support. They say this was bug in beta device software which was overlooked in release version. This problem plus the inability for the to read waypoints loaded from PC onto the SD card are very disappointing. Hope it gets fixed soon. I feel a bit ripped off by this as most of my waypoints are entered in the field while I hike or bike, and later made into routes on maps for others or my later use (e.g. fishing spots on mountain lakes, turns on back country routes in local national parks, et cetera). If I can’t recall waypoints from device, to make route map on PC, and can’t even load than new route into SD card, what’s the use of the map software except armchair PC map making. Big problem.
July 26th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
I’m pretty sure that the most recent version of BaseCamp 2.0.6 will download waypoints from the device. If you connect the 550t in the lower left corner you’ll see all of the waypoints and geocaches on the unit.
Even if that isn’t the case you can Import the gpx files in GarminGPX which contain the waypoints. A few more steps but it works.
http://www8.garmin.com/support/download_details.jsp?id=4435
July 27th, 2009 at 10:20 am
No problem downloading waypoints with the Mac version of BaseCamp. However, I do encounter the above issue with RoadTrip, basically, the Mac version of Mapsource.
July 28th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
1) The updated Oregon Manuals are now available for download at https://buy.garmin.com/shop/store/manual.jsp?product=010-00697-11&cID=145&pID=26876.
2) I was looking at the Dakota 20, but now think the Oregon 400t is a better bet as they are selling at the same price at present and I have no problems with the 2 axis compass in my eTrex Vista HCx
July 28th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
@Chris, thanks for the links. I figured we would see manuals for all Oregons soon.
You might be right about the 400t vs. Dakota 20 given pricing right now. I think over time the Dakotas should move down below the Oregon.
August 1st, 2009 at 10:08 pm
I don’t know what is happen.
But today my oregon 550 don’t turn on…
I try change battery, plug USB Power in my car, and plug USB Cable in my notebook
Nothing happen…
August 2nd, 2009 at 9:39 pm
Do you see anything when you power on like the Garmin banner?
-Scott
August 9th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
I CANNOT believe Garmin released the 550t without 1:24,000 mapping ability. 1:100k is “yesterday’s news”. I’m baffled – and extremely disappointed.
August 9th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
The 550t does have 1:24k map “ability”. It comes preinstalled with 1:100k maps but there are plenty of 1:24k maps that can be purchased or downloaded for free to use with the 550 or 550t.
-Scott
August 10th, 2009 at 1:14 pm
Hummm consulting REI I see Dakota 20 at USD 349 and Oregon 400t at USD 499. What do you mean “the same pricing” ?
August 10th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Probably this comment belongs on the Dakota review, but first off I think you need to compare to the Oregon 300 (since neither has built in maps) which as a list price of $399. Also, if you look at Amazon or GPSCity, you’ll notice the 300 sells well below list (around $360) right now.
-Scott
August 10th, 2009 at 11:28 pm
Scott – Many thanks for your com on the 550t – but I stand by my initial frustration. Most everyone I know wants, needs, & desires 1:24K. In a nutshell, … better everything. 1:100K just doesn’t give the detail you need in some operating environs. Ergo, I’m shocked, but $houldn’t be (note: dollar $ign for effect)that Garmin doesn’t install 1:24K as standard. After all, this is their latest model (Oregon) release and it is 2009, isn’t it? Sorry if I’m seem cynical, but Garmin is just gouging us. I know, so what else is new. I did look at the new Dakota. To be fair, it does come with 1:24K standard. Correct me if I’m wrong but it is also about .5″ to 1″ less screen space and, well, it just “looks” like a cheap “knock-off” when compared side-by-side to (any) Oregon. That said, it is less expensive and Garmin corrected the sun-glare screen problem with Dakota. So, WHY-THE-HECK did they go and make it smaller??? My eyesight isn’t getting better with age!
August 11th, 2009 at 5:27 am
I’d love to see 1:24k topos preinstalled as well, but I guess Garmin does what they think they can get away with in the market place. Are there any handhelds which come with 1:24k topos preinstalled today? Garmin also has other issues 1) they don’t currently have coverage for the entire US and 2) 1:24k maps for the entire US would consume huge amounts of memory (64G-128G by my rough calcs).
Note that the Dakota does not come with any preinstalled maps other than a very poor basemap. It compares to the Oregon 300 and for some people smaller will be better. If I’m going backwoods hiking I want the smallest, lightest unit which has the best battery life. In that case I’m looking at an eTrex or Dakota, not an Oregon.
August 11th, 2009 at 8:50 am
dear scott
first fo all thanks for all the infos and review you are putting together. this is a great sight.
i am just about to buy a GPS which i mainly (90%) will use for mountain biking. so i am a little twisted between the Oregon 550t and the edge 705.
i have some question regarding the 550t
can it be charged while running, i.e. can the batteries be charged with an external power pack (which is possible with the edge 705)
can i use a program like training center/sportstrack to monitor heartrate, cadence, speed?
does the oregon support speed with the cadene metder GSP 10
how do you rate the bicycle holder?
will the GSP recetption accuracy issue be fixed in your opinon?
cheers
michel
August 11th, 2009 at 9:03 am
550t cannot be charged using external power, although it can be powered externally via USB. The unit runs on 2x AA’s. NiMH highly recommended.
See http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/Fitness for information on what works on the Oregon.
The Oregon does not get speed from the cadence sensor (just cadence). Speed comes from the GPS.
The bike holder from Garmin is okay, but it tends to slip around, I would look at the RAM mount instead.
GPS accuracy will probably improve. I think for biking and fitness purposes though you won’t notice much difference between the Edge and Oregon. Mostly a concern with geocaching and trail mapping.
-Scott
August 11th, 2009 at 10:14 am
wow, that was quick.
just to clarify: so i can use the 550 with an external battry pack without affecting the batteries inside, right?
do you have any experience how cadence meter and heart rate belt affect operating time?
any other suggestions regaring mounts? it seems that i am able to get the RAM mount here in Europe.
cheers, michel
August 11th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
Yes, the 550 works with external power when the batteries are installed.
I don’t have any experience with battery life and the cadence/HRM.
The only bike mounts I’m aware of are the Garmin and RAM mounts. Does GPSCity ship outside the US?
-Scott
August 13th, 2009 at 1:21 pm
8GB MicroSD not working
I have an Oregon 550, not the 550t and the wiki mentions that users have reported that the Sandisk 8GB card works. Mine did not. I tried (2)8GB cards. One was from Target and was a cheap brand and I bought an official Sandisk average 8GB MicroSD card from newegg and neither can be recognized by the device. When I called tech support they said anything over 4GB is “so overkill” and that the unit can only hold 4000 maps(which he said is 4 states). The problem is that I am travelling through 22 states and 28 national parks and was wanting to load a lot on there and also have room for plenty of pictures. I really wish they would update their website with this as my 8GB MicroSD was only $29 which means that in a few months the majority of users may start buying the 8GB.
September 14th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
mygarmin’s “My Photos” was far from picture perfect. I received an e-mail from Garmin suggesting that I would be able to upload my photos at mygarmin.com and position them on a map that I can share with my friends.
Maybe I haven’t looked hard enough… maybe I misunderstood the pitch… I can find no such feature; mygarmin’s “My Photos” simply points me to PicasaWeb.
Irritation #1: mygarmin requires Active-X download(s) and I had to ramp down IE security to “Low” so they would download, to get the mygarmin dashboard to work at all.
Irritation #2: myGarmin dashboard does not support IE7. Huh? In what fantasy world are Garmin developers living?
The dashboard warned me to register first. Trying to register required me to upgrade the GPS software first. That’s all optional.
I’m no expert on PicasaWeb, but it is Irritation #3. The images uploaded to PicasaWeb are not rotated, so all pics taken with the GPS upright are 90 degrees sideways in PicasaWeb. Captions added to the JPG on the PC are not transferred to PicasaWeb. All of this can be rectified with some time-consuming manual effort.
Finally, I see no way to connect my PicasaWeb album to mygarmin.com and display photos on a shared map. The best substitute I can find is to create a Google Map and do it there. I’ve used that method before, and it is disappointing.
“Disappointing” in fact is a good word to summarize my experience trying this feature.
September 16th, 2009 at 8:06 am
Denis,
I would suggest skipping the MyPhoto support at my Garmin and using something like Picasa + PicasaWeb directly. This is what I do and the photos come out located properly on the map and are also rotated properly assuming that you have calibrated the compass. The photos can be uploaded directly from the unit (without the “help” of myGarmin) and can be located on a map by Picasa as well as many other 3rd party tools because the Oregon 550 embeds a standard “EXIF” header embedded in the the photos that includes the location.
-Scott
October 5th, 2009 at 7:28 pm
On my compass i have lost my pointer, i have reset the 550T but still no pointer arrow. Has anyone come accross this before.
October 5th, 2009 at 8:14 pm
Are you navigating to a destination – if not you won’t see the bearing pointer in the middle of the compass.
October 6th, 2009 at 6:24 am
Thanks, i realised that after i posted. I was having what my wife calls “a blonde moment”
October 24th, 2009 at 6:54 am
I am currently using a Colorado 300 with complete GB TOPO mapping on a 2GB SD card. I mainly use my unit for mountain biking and a little walking/hiking.
Do you think there are any advantages in my ‘upgrading’ to an Oregon 550T in terms of mapping, screen readability, additional memory?
The appealling things about the Oregon are the 3 axis compass and ability to take photos without carrying a seperate camera.
Very usual and informative site. I would have been lost completely with my Colorado when I upgraded from my Etrex Vista C 18 months ago with the colorado wiki even though it was in relatively early days. Many Thanks Rich
October 24th, 2009 at 6:59 am
Sorry a few typo’s in my last message the last paragraph was meant to read:
A very useful and informative site. I would have been lost completely with my Colorado when I upgraded from my Etrex Vista C 18 months ago without the aid of the colorado wiki which proved invaluable and saved the unit from being returned to Amazon within hours of receipt. Many Thanks Rich
October 24th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Depending on the condition of your CO300 the upgrade to a 550 would probably set you back about $250USD.
The biggest benefits of the x50 are the touchscreen, increased capacity, faster lock and boot times, 3-axis compass and the camera.
Brightness of the Colorado is actually slightly better than the x50’s and mapping support will also be identical. GPS performance these days is also similar. Oregon has a better waterproof design.
That said you’ll probably have to decide if those features are worth the cost of the upgrade or not.
You might also see what the rumored Oregon 450 is all about. If you don’t need a camera this might be a less expensive option.
October 24th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Thanks for the quick reply Scott. Good to get some idenpendant advice from someone who has experience of both units.
As I would be buying in the UK then the cost would be around 310GBP so maybe $400-$450 at curent rates so the outlay is quite large if the benefits would not hugely noticable.
Certainly food for thought. I might hang on to what I have got until spring next year and see what Garmin have available by then.
Once again many thanks and keep up the invaluable work that GPSFix does.
Best Regards
Rich
October 27th, 2009 at 10:43 am
Recently, I have bought an Oregon 550t and I can see that the internal memory is around 652 MB and not 850 MB as I hopped. Does Anyone know why of this difference?
Best regards
José Eugenio
October 27th, 2009 at 11:28 am
Jose,
Do you have a US 550t or does it have preinstalled maps for another part of the world (i.e Europe)? What is the total size of internal memory (not just free space)? How big is the file called gmapsupp.img?
-Scott
October 27th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
My Oregon has the Recreational map of Europe v3.01 (I bought in Spain). Also I read in information about maps (where you can select the map to use)WW Autoroute DEM Basemap NR. All memory is 3.65 GB.Used 3.1 GB, free 652 MB. The biggest file inside occupies 2.95 GB (it´s called gmapprom.img ).
Thank you again,
José Eugenio
October 27th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
Jose,
Your European 550t has the same amount of internal memory as my US 550t but your map file is about 200MB larger (gmapprom.img) than mine. Same hardware but you just have more map data loaded than the US version.
-Scott
October 27th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
OK, Thanks a lot Scott, I supposed something like that.
Now, I feel better.
See you,
José E.