Garmin Oregon 550t – A (Geotagged) Picture is Worth A Thousand Words

Today online retailers like GPSNow.com started shipping Garmin’s new top of the line outdoor handheld GPS, the Oregon 550 and Oregon 550t. I’ve been able to get my hands on an Oregon 550t and will kick things off with a first impressions post to detail my experience with the new GPS receiver.
The two new Oregon models, the 550 and 550t, are closely related to the touchscreen Oregon 300 and 400 models which Garmin released a year ago. They are identical in size and similar in function with a few notable upgrades on the x50 models including a 3.2MP digital auto-focus camera, support for geotagged photos and a 3-axis compass. The major difference between the two new models is that the 550t includes preinstalled 100k US Topo maps which look identical to the topo maps on my Oregon 400t. The 550t has 4GB of internal memory with about 1GB free (Garmin specs 850MB) after you take away space for the topo maps and other files. I’m guessing that like the Oregon 300 the 550 has only a basemap and 1GB of memory leaving a around 900MB free.
Hardware and GPS Receiver
The Oregon 550t I received is running software 2.10 and GPS software 3.40. I’ve taken the unit apart and I can confirm that it is using the ST Cartesio chipset like the Oregon x00 series (see photo below of 550t). I was hopeful for a different chipset given the issues that the Cartesio has under tree cover at walking speeds, but this is an area where Garmin is continuing to work on improvements for the entire Oregon line so I’m hopeful we’ll see further improvements.
Externally there really isn’t much to report on other than the location of camera lens on the back side above the familiar rail mount. The latch which closes the battery cover is now spring loaded and that gives it a more positive compared to the x00 series Oregon. The carabiner that comes with the 550 is a little shorter than the Oregon x00 series carabiner so that it doesn’t get in the way of the camera lens. The good news is that all the existing Oregon and Colorado rail mount accessories should work the same with the 550 models.
In addition to the newly designed carabiner the 550t comes with the owner’s manual on CD (which also serves as an updated manual for the x00 Oregon’s), a quick start guide, a four cell NiMH AA battery charger and two low-discharge 2000mAh AA NiMH batteries. As I suspected Garmin does not recommend using alkaline batteries in the 550t if you are going to use the camera. I’ve noticed that using the camera does drain the batteries quickly but I’ll need more time to complete some battery tests.
Screen
When you power on the 550t the first thing you notice is that the screen looks a little different than the x00 Oregon. I’m guessing we are looking at the same touchscreen display as the x00 Oregon with a different protective layer that is glossy, instead of a matte cover like the x00 series. The end result is brighter display than the x00 series, I would estimate 10-15% brighter, and similar to the Colorado. You do see more reflections with the glossy surface and I also wonder about its scratch resistance, but overall this is an improvement over the Oregon x00’s. Although it is almost impossible to capture a “typical” picture of the screen the photos below show the unit running with full backlight in indirect outdoor light, bright direct sunlight and low light as compared to the Oregon 400t (right)
Camera, Images and Geotagging Support
The camera was my next stop. Garmin allows you to control the resolution (3.2MP, 2.0MP or 1.oMP) and storage location for the images (internal memory or SD card). The low light mode and digital zoom controls (up to 4x according to the specs) are found directly on the camera screen. As we reported yesterday the camera and the photo viewer both make use of the accelerometer and turn when the unit is rotated to work in either portrait or landscape mode. Auto-focus is activated by pressing the shutter button and holding it until the framing square on the screen turns green (see image below). Releasing the shutter button takes the picture. Pretty standard stuff but implemented in a typical easy-to-use Garmin fashion. I did find myself wishing for faster access to a preview mode and a way to quickly delete unwanted photos (you can delete any photo — you just have leave the camera and go into the photo viewer). The shutter lag is noticeable, I took a number of bad photos as a result of moving the camera away too quickly. On the flip side I notice that the camera can focus about two inches away from the subject to take macro shots.
If a photo is geotagged, and every photo seems to be tagged if the GPS has lock when you take the photo, you will see a “globe” button at the bottom of the page in the photo viewer which displays the location of the photo on the map. If you look at the details of the photo it tells you the coordinates, time taken, camera it was taken with, and distance away. Elevation would have been nice too. The photo viewer has some nice filter options for photos including most recently taken, near a location or on a specific date. I uploaded a geotagged picture from Picasa/Google Earth and it was recognized by the Oregon 550t and located properly on the map.
Like waypoints and points of interest, photos are a objects you can navigate to under the WhereTo menu. Photos you have taken can also be used as your background thanks to a new configuration option.
Waypoints on the 550t have a new photo attribute which allows you to associate a waypoint with a photo and waypoints can also be easily created from photos. If you view a waypoint with a photo or a photo in a list view you will see a small thumbnail of the photo next to the waypoint/photo name. I really wish Garmin would add the waypoint symbol here for waypoints without photos!
Picture quality is good, not great — about what you would probably expect from a good cell phone camera but not as good as my kids’ $80 Canon point and shoot. In 3.2MP resolution mode the pictures are saves as 2048×1536 JPEG’s and they are between 400kB to 900kB in size, the average being around 600kB-700kB per photo. Click on the thumbnails below to see the full images.
I haven’t been able to access the myGarmin photo upload service yet but Picasa was able to recognize the Oregon 550t and uploaded photos quickly thanks to the high speed USB interface.
3-axis Compass
The 3-axis compass is another feature I was anxious to try. I’ve never liked the 2-axis compass on the older models because of the need to hold the unit flat. The 3-axis compass is similar except you calibrate once on each axis, which takes about the same amount of time to calibrate as the 2-axis compass. The compass turns on/off around 1-2mph like the x00 Oregon but it is much easier to rely on since you don’t need to worry about how you are holding the unit. Garmin has changed the look and feel of the compass as well, not only did they “supersize” the compass pointer (you can still select the thin pointer), but the rotation of the compass is much smoother. The pointer no longer jumps to a new heading, it glides like a real compass. Although I’m not a compass page navigator I think those who rely on the compass tool will like these changes.
I did experience two calibration failures and one case where the compass started spinning which required a reset. Time will tell if this is going to be frequent problem or not.
UserDataSync
There have been changes in the 550 around how data is managed but I need to spend a little more time with this feature to understand it more completely. The GarminDevice.xml file mentions a “UserDataSync” mode for the content in \Garmin\GPX which is different than the x00 Oregon. Based on my initial testing it looks like waypoints and routes created on the unit are stored in daily gpx files in \Garmin\GPX. Deleting these files or the waypoints and routes contained in these files removes the objects on the unit itself. If this is the case it would be a hidden but somewhat radical difference from the x00 Oregon’s which keep separate internal databases that are not directly accessible by external software programs like BaseCamp and Mapsource. From a user perspective this would eliminate a lot questions around how data is managed.
High Speed USB
The high speed USB interface is another nice “sleeper” feature. I haven’t timed it yet but map transfers to the unit are much faster than my 400t. The 550t also supports the “any name” map file support added in the x00 Oregon which gets you away from the limitation of only being able to use a few very specific filenames to load maps (i.e. gmapsupp.img)
Miscellaneous
Geocaching, Wherigo, trip computer, 3D view, profile management, wireless transfer, altimeter and the other tools that the x00 Oregon’s picked up during the recent beta phase all seem to work the same. The map page does use a new set of larger high color icons which are easier to see but can cover up the map in congested areas (see below).
Summary
Even though a picture might be worth a thousand words the question is whether the Oregon 550t is worth $599 and the 550 is worth $499? There is no question that these are expensive units and ultimately you’ll need to decide whether the camera with geotagging, improved visibility screen, 3-axis compass, high speed USB and other minor tweaks are worth it. I’m guessing that most folks who forked over money for an Oregon 300 or 400 in the last year aren’t going to see the need to upgrade right now. But the Oregon 550 deserves some serious consideration if you are in the market for a GPSMAP 60CSx, Colorado, Oregon or Delorme PN-40 and think that the integrated camera is something that you’ll use.
As a geocacher having a camera with geotagging support is my primary motivation for getting the 550t. I already carry a separate camera for recording hints, coordinates, interesting containers, damaged containers, and maps at trailheads. None of these require a fancy camera but all of these uses could be enhanced if the photos were geotagged. This reason alone was enough to push me up into the 550t series. For other outdoor activities, recreational or professional, which require the recording of data using photos, geotagging can be a real time saver and Garmin’s all-in-one Oregon 550t makes it very easy and fun to use.
Over the next few weeks I’ll be busy adding content on the Garmin Oregon wiki including a Versions page, Issues List and FAQs for the Oregon 550. In particular I’ll be on the watch for stability concerns as the initial releases of both the Colorado and Oregon were plagued with crashes and bugs. So far, my experience with stability has been good other than the issues with the compass, but more runtime is required. I’ll be posting here again on GPSFix about the 550t as I get more information on stability, GPS receiver performance, battery life (it is definitely worse), USB transfer rates, the DataSync feature and any other differences I encounter.
If you have any questions about the Oregon 550t or something you didn’t see covered in this post, please feel free to post a question and I’ll either respond or add my response to a future post.
Where to Buy
GPSNow.com is about the only place shipping these units today although many sites have them available for preorder. I would expect them to be showing up in the next day or two at other retailers. The good news is that I can highly recommend GPSNow.com for their customer service as I have personally bought GPS receivers and accessories through them.
Related posts:















July 10th, 2009 at 1:21 pm
what’s the depth contours on the maps? I was looking at a 400t a month ago and depth was mentioned at 40 I think, and I was told about the 550 and that it might be less in this version. Does the screen really make a big difference outdoors, I’d would be using it primarily on hikes and offroad.
July 10th, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Sorry, not sure what you mean by depth contours. Are you asking about the spacing between elevation contours on the topo maps? This is a function of the map and is 25′ on both my 400t and 550t.
The screen does make a difference outdoors but it is not huge, like I said above it is probably 10-15% brighter. In order of brightness it goes something like this:
60CSx(brightest) > Colorado/OR550t(tie) > OR400t(least bright)
July 10th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
I guess I’ll keep geotagging my photos by hand. Two Oregon 300s for the price of one 500? Or one 300 and a lot of compasses? Wish it had a different chipset, or maybe if they could fix the current one (like the currently working nüvi 2×5/5×0 and PN-20/PN-40 that all share the same chipset).
July 10th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
I am not interested in the camera, but the brightness of the screen is certainly a consideration… is the 550 worth the price premium over the 300 simply for the better screen? It’s over $100 USD difference here in Canada.
I am looking for a replacement for my aging original eTrex Vista.
July 10th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
When you take the camera out of the picture $100 seems like a lot to pay for high speed USB, 3-axis compass, a little brighter screen and a few other bells and whistles. I think you either have to justify the camera or wait for the prices to drop a bit (and they will in a few weeks).
-Scott
July 10th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Thanks for the review Scott.
I pre-ordered a 550 (no “T”) and I am waiting for it to be shipped. Here in Canada the “Expected” ship date is July 15th, I am waiting to see if it is so.
…Brent…
July 10th, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Boy, Hoover has really grown since we last saw him. He also looks a lot more laid back.
Anniebananie
July 10th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Hey Mike! We need to get out caching again now that Hoover’s leg is better. Long story, but he is more mellow now!
July 10th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Brent,
Let us know when they start shipping. Did you buy from gpscity.ca?
July 10th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
I almost forgot the increased capacity limits. Just threw on 3000 caches and it seems to work fine.
-Scott
July 10th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Hi Scott,
Yes I did buy it from GPSCity.ca.
I want to dive into the differences between the 550T, in regards to memory size and use.
I would have happily stuck with the 300, but my buddy wanted to buy it and now I can get the 550. I have the Canadian topos, so there was no advantage to ordering nt Canadaian T model.
Cheers,
…Brent…
July 11th, 2009 at 9:53 am
Brent,
When you get the unit would you mind sharing the memory capacity of the 550?
-Scott
July 12th, 2009 at 12:45 am
I will pass along everthing I can find out.
…Brent…
July 12th, 2009 at 3:25 am
hi,
the example-images are direct from the 550? no modifications are made?
then it is very sad, that the garmin-development don’t implement the posibility of the compass to tag the image with the dircection of the shot. in the exif-specification there is a tag “GPSImgDirection” this should be implemented!
July 12th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
can you pre program your route on the computer and load it onto the 550t?
July 13th, 2009 at 7:11 am
Scott,
Any problem with the camera area and the existing Oregon carry case or auto/bike carry case that you can tell?
Thanks,
Dave
July 13th, 2009 at 7:12 am
Actually I should have said RAM carriers for the auto/bike mounts.
July 13th, 2009 at 8:22 am
@Fossy, the images posted are direct from the camera (if you click on the thumbnail you can see the entire thing). I like the suggestion of tagging the photo with the direction taken!
I’ve also noticed that Garmin does seem to record the elevation in the EXIF region but it doesn’t show up on the unit in any of the image screens.
@Dave, I don’t have a RAM mount so I’m not sure. The camera would only create a fit issue if it came in contact with the back right where the lens it because the shape of the battery cover is very similar to the older Oregon’s. Whether the camera could be used while the unit is in the mount is a different question. I wouldn’t be surprised if the lens was at least partially blocked.
-Scott
July 13th, 2009 at 8:35 am
Gail, You can preprogram a route into the unit. It works the same as most Garmin GPS’s. If you create a route in Mapsoure or Basecamp (or other 3rd party software) it can be uploaded onto the Oregon 550t and it is visible in the Route Planner and as an available destination under WhereTo?
-Scott
July 13th, 2009 at 11:50 am
Silly but quick question: did they fix the Earthcache icon?
July 13th, 2009 at 12:00 pm
@maingray, Nope. Still shows as a trad.
I would say that there has been a lot software reuse between the x00 and x50 Oregon’s. Most of the issue in the x00 still show up on the 550. Issues in the new features (compass/camera) are obviously unique to the 550 but everything else is very similar (bug for bug compatible as we say!)
-Scott
July 13th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
@maingray, Here’s a solution for the earthcache thing, its funny I just happened to read this after I saw your post.
http://gsak.net/board/index.php?showtopic=11444&st=120entry82037
July 13th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
hi again,
could you make a “foto-section” in the oregon-wiki an put the “direction-thing” on the wish-list? may be a garmin-developer takes a look to the site and like it to?
July 13th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Will do. I’m trying to get an issues list (which includes features requests) set up on the Oregon wiki. Might take a few more days.
-Scott
July 13th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
Scott, and i was just coming to tell you about that solution.
LOVE it. Always used to use custom icons for caches as waypoints in the Vista HCX, for size, etc exactly how HHL uses. Boy, this unit just got better.
July 13th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
[...] Oregon 550 and Garmin Dakota information GPS Fix has a detailed review of the Garmin Oregon 550 and 550t, including handy comparisons to other Oregon models. I am planning to buy a new GPS around [...]
July 14th, 2009 at 7:40 am
How long does it take to make a photo? i mean the time between pressing the photo button and making the photo.
i hope you understand my question. i’am german
July 14th, 2009 at 8:01 am
Scott, thanks for posting all of this useful information! Good reading. My 550t gets delivered today! When you mention “two low-discharge 2000mAh AA NiMH batteries”, by low-discharge, do you mean lower capacity (2000)? I use Powerex 2700mAh. I assume these are OK?
July 14th, 2009 at 9:45 am
@englishfire, if you press and hold the shutter button to activate the auto-focus the shutter lag is probably less than 400-500ms (a bit of guess, but it is pretty fast). The auto-focus probably adds another 1 second to the lag if you don’t already have it set. Again, I don’t have any way to precisely measure it.
@rbgatti, Congrats. Let me know what you like and don’t like. I’m trying to get another post up today and get the Issues List going on the wiki. By low discharge I meant to say that these are Eneloop type NiMH batteries. They work fine but I use 2700mAh Powerex batteries in mine – I’m convinced that these are the best NiMH batteries out there. Watch the camera, it really takes a hit on battery life.
July 14th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
My thanks also for your posting this information! Received my 550t this morning. The screen is improved, even readable outdoors in bright sunlight with shaded relief on. More sensitive and responsive to the touch than the 400. My compass calibrated very quickly – didn’t even require a full rotation in any axis. One omission I have noticed, no elevation readings between contour lines as with the 400. Maybe I am overly fixated on elevation, but I found this really convenient, especially in flat areas where there might be few contour lines nearby. I wonder if the omission is by intention or oversight?
July 14th, 2009 at 2:17 pm
Thanks for the report John.
I’ve reported the issue on elevation to Garmin and they claim a fix is on the way. Hopefully I’ll have the Issues List up today for the x50.
-Scott
July 14th, 2009 at 7:14 pm
Got my 550t this morning also and I have to say, I’m impressed. I have to agree with everything John said. But special attention is deserved for the compass…SWEET! It works and it’s accurate. I can sit stationary in my chair, rotate and see myself spin accurately on the map no matter how I hold the unit. Screen is easier to read too…I like the glossy finish better. Doesn’t really show fingerprints any more or less than the 400t. I have to plan more with waypoint files. Loaded a bunch from my old unit and they are sitting in an import file. Waypoints created on the unit go into daily files. Forget “receiving from device” in Mapsource. I don’t think it’s a problem…just need to get used to it. Regarding WAAS. I’m finding sat 51 with a strong sig but it just sits there trying to lock like my 400t did. More testing planned…so far, nice job Garmin!
Rico
July 15th, 2009 at 3:27 am
Can someone with the new device explain how the new user data sync is working? More like iTunes where you can change data an both side and the software always is using the newest version?
July 15th, 2009 at 5:28 am
WWERNER, Yes that is a pretty good comparison. Let me explain it another way by comparing it to the Oregon x00. On the Oregon x00 if you create a waypoint and route on the GPS itself you can view the waypoint or route from software running on your computer (e.g. BaseCamp) but you cannot modify it so that the GPS can see those edits.
On the Oregon x50 if you edit or delete the waypoint or route those changes are visible the next time you restart your GPS.
UserDataSync makes it look like there is only one copy of the data (in gpx files) that is used by the GPS and visible when connected in mass storage mode.
July 15th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
[...] from the new features I noted in my first impressions post the unit has functioned and behaved like an Oregon 400t, it has all of the same features and most [...]
July 16th, 2009 at 1:02 am
Thanks Scott. That’s very helpful.
It sounds like they finally solved the annoying synchronisation procedure between the Garmin device and the desktop computer. Very often the user ended up with two versions of a waypoint or route.
On the other side: Is there a backup available in case I would loose my GPS or in case I would have to cold start / reset the Garmin device?
Regards
WWERNER
July 16th, 2009 at 5:40 am
There isn’t anything new in terms of backup support. Backing up still consists of periodically copying all of your files to your computer.
-Scott
July 16th, 2009 at 10:36 am
I am looking at purchasing the 550 and then adding the 24k regional topo map that is specific for my area on SD card. Instead of getting the 550t with the 100k US map. I don’t plan on using it much out of my region. I have two questions. 1)Is the 24k region topo that much better than the 100k US map to make this decision, or should I just go with the 550T? 2) If you use an SD card type add-on map can you still use the SD card to store user type data? Or is it the case you have to decided whether you want the map or the storage? With having the camera you would think that you would need the SD card storage… What my plan with the camera was to take an initial photo of the POI to get the geotag info and then use my regular camera to take additional photos of that POI. Then all you have to do is match them by time and geotag them with google or other utility.
July 16th, 2009 at 10:50 am
Some answers:
1) 24k maps have two advantages, they do have more detail and the roads on these maps are autorouting (you can follow a route along a road). I’ve heard that the trail data, however, is not as up to date in some cases as the 100k maps. If there are areas where you have specific concerns you might check out the map preview tool on Garmin’s site to compare them in an area that you are familiar with. Note that there are some very good free topo maps at GPSFileDepot.com . The roads do not autoroute on these but the detail is pretty good, I would try these first to see if they work for you.
2) I don’t think so. I usually suggest that people purchase the DVD maps so that they also use the maps on computer. SD card maps only work on the unit and aren’t available in BaseCamp. With 1GB of internal storage you can still store quite a few 500-800kB photos but yes, normally it would be better to keep them on an SD card.
-Scott
July 16th, 2009 at 6:28 pm
I was wondering if anyone has had a chance to see if the 550t will work with Canon’s WFT-E3A and a 50D. I really really hope so
. Thanks.
July 17th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
I got my 550t from REI a couple of days ago, and am impressed with it. I’ve been using the 300 for a couple of months exclusively for geocaching, and the addition of the camera means I have one less item to tote along.
One problem I’m having with the 550t that really ticks me off however. When I load my Pocket Queries and GPX files from geocaching.com, I like to put them on my external data card. On the 300, that was no problem, I could see them just fine. With the 550t, it will only see my caches when I load them onto the internal memory. If I load them to the microSD only, it doesn’t see them. I contacted Garmin about this, and was told that none of the Oregon series will read GPX/geocaching files from the external card, only the internal memory. I told them that it must be a fluke that my Oregon 300 will read them, and the support tech replied “Yup”. Is it a fluke that my 300 will read them off the external card?
Two other notes, I am able to use a 16gb microSD card to store/view/transfer photos with no problems. Also, if you purchase the City Navigator NT DVD, they WILL NOT allow you to transfer it to your new device. Even though I purchased mine less than two months ago, I had to buy another one (at the full $99 price) to get that functionality on the 550t. According to Garmin, the serial number of the DVD is tied to the serial number of the unit you unlock it with forever. They tell you that it is NavTeq’s licensing requirements that make this so. I only found this out after digging through the Garmin FAQs, it’s not mentioned anywhere else that it is tied to one device.
July 17th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
If I buy a DVD map, for the 550t, does the map load into the internal memory, or onto the SD card – or do I have a choice?
July 17th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
You have a choice.
July 22nd, 2009 at 11:57 am
Ok I got the 550t for about 2 weeks now. Here are my points of this monster GPS
Pros: The screen. In daylight one of the best.
Storage and speed. I have all the mapsets in it 2010 NA City navigator, Bluecharts, Topo 24 K for parks. (i’m still waiting for the 24K East coast to be released) 100 K preloaded map, 2008 topo just for comparison. So I used this on the trail, in the car and on the water. The GPS is great. I came from Garmin to Magellan and back to Garmin. Tried the Triton and I have to admit that I liked on the triton option to listen music and take picture and video. Not that I can’t have MP3 player but this unit was also waterproof so during padling I didn’t worry a bit. However the screens sucked. It was not as sensitive as the 550t and you couldn’t see anything during bright daylight. It had many other bugs.
The 550t has few issues as well. One is if you want to use this on your bike I rather have it in horizontaly positioned not vertically. The temperature sensor is missing. This is a must for such unit. The pictures are bad and I mean bad. If you take 10 year old 3.2 megapixel camera you do better job. you have to use lot of correction in Photoshp. However seeing the photos with coordinates is plus. I’m really surprised about the battery life. I’m using 2500 NIMH duraccell the new line and I have beein using this for nearly 2 days ( heavily playing with it and it’s still on) So I would recommend this to everyone who had an old GPS and needs upgrade. To everyone who wants to use this on the water because the Bluecharts on it are great (not the G2 versions, they were recalled) and all the other stuff like Geocaching is just great. You all with reading glasses will apprecaite bigger screen. Rei sales them already. This unit after registering will give you 10% discount on any accessories or additional unit from Garmin. So be smart buy one from REI and get 10% then get the coupon from Garmin and buy one from Garmin and return the unit back to REI. They usually won’t say a word. You save 60+ bucks right there
July 22nd, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Cont: 2you can also plan your route using any old mapsource since mapsource released updates, upload the geocaching within mapsource from PC to Unit. Plan your route using Google earth and convert the file from KML to GPX or just upload it inot mapsource. I will get today IGO tip A53 and see if if my IGO system can charge this unit in the car. This will save additional 20 bucks or so. The unit is quite heavy but it’s ok. You don’t need any special case it’s well rugged. And the supplied belt clip with carabine is just great to attach on your PFD or pens or whatever. Garmin even sends you batteries and charger so you are all set. If you buy this unit for camera then don’t. buy small GPS and small waterproof camera and you save money. But if you like to take some pics and like to travel light only with one thing it is right for you. Sorry for the long post
July 23rd, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Can someone please clarify the microsd memory capacity for the 550t/550? I’m reading conflicting information on this from various blogs so far. Rich from this forum states that he could “use a 16gb microSD card to store/view/transfer photos with no problems”. One reviewer from the the REI.com site stated that he could not get his 550 to recognize a 16 GB card. I’m wondering if there would really be a difference in external card capacity between the 550 and 550t? Furthermore, assuming the units CAN read a 16GB card, would there be any limitation to storing all the map info to the card?
July 23rd, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Garmin has always been funny about spec’ing SD cards for their units. I haven’t heard an exact limit for the 550t, but I know on the x00’s pretty much every 4GB worked and most 8GB cards worked. I had heard of people who had successfully used 16GB cards but only 1-2 people. Personally I’ve been able to use 4GB and 8GB SanDisk and Transcend Class4 and Class6 SDHC cards without any issue.
July 23rd, 2009 at 6:16 pm
I spoke to a Garmin rep today that said on the new 550 and 550t units you now had the ability to rename map files on the external memory card and still have the device recognize it. You no longer have to use “gmapsupp.img” for the device to recognize it. For example, in addition to “gmapsupp.img” you could have another map file called “citynav.img” and the device will recognize both. He did not mention a limit to the number of different map files the device will recognize. Can someone please test this feature out??? If it works, I wonder if this can be used as a work around for the map segment limitation of 4096? I’d like to be able to load all the maps from the US topo DVD (6633 segments) using two topo map files, and another map file for city navigator and other maps. This would give users a lot more flexibility.
July 23rd, 2009 at 6:20 pm
This feature is already supported in the 300/400 and I’ve tested it on those units and the 550/550t. It works as tech support described but it doesn’t increase the number of map segments supported. Total across all files is still 4000 and the max file size is still 4G.
July 27th, 2009 at 6:36 am
[...] Here are my observations based on my experience with the Dakota 20 I have which is running Software Version 2.10 and GPS Software 3.40 (sound familiar?). [...]
July 30th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
Does anyone know if the 500 and 500t has 3D Map Viewing like it’s predecessor Oregon 400t?
July 31st, 2009 at 11:04 am
The x50 Oregon’s support 3D view. The 550t does by default, the 550 will if you load maps that support it (ie. 24k topos, US Topo 2008 100k).
-Scott
July 31st, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Hello. Could you tell me if Oregon 550 support a 8GB memory card? And compared with a 440T,is much better the sreen of 550t?
Thank you
August 1st, 2009 at 9:48 am
The 550 should support an 8GB SDHC card although I have not tried one myself (I use 4GB SanDisk cards).
The 550t is about 10-15% brighter than the x00 Oregons.
-Scott
August 1st, 2009 at 11:24 am
Hello. I´m going to use it on my bike. Do you think that the reflection of the screen , perhaps, will be a problem? I´m not very sure if I must buy a 550 or a 400, help me, please!!
You said that the screen of 550 is similar to the screen to the Colorado. Is this right?
Thank you very much!!
August 2nd, 2009 at 7:25 am
Carlos, I used mine this week on a bike several times and the 550t is easier to see than the 400t on a bike, no question.
The 550t is similar in brightness and visibility to a Colorado.
-Scott
August 2nd, 2009 at 12:27 pm
There is a 1-star review for the 550 at REI: http://www.rei.com/product/782640
It claims that the unit cannot use a >4gb SD card. Also, it complains very strongly about the screen which is almost unreadable outdoors.
Next, there is another 1-star review for the 550t at REI:
http://www.rei.com/product/784883
This also complains that the screen is unusable outdoors. It says: “When going from direct sunlight to shade, the screen can’t be read at all.”
I’ve been considering purchasing the 550 but these reviews highly discourage me.
Interestingly, there is also a 5-star review for the 550t at the same site. However, it only talks about the readibility of the screen in direct sunlight, claiming that it is excellent. That’s fine, but quite often you would use the unit while in the woods, i.e. in the shade, not in direct sunlight. If it is hard to see in the woods, well, that’s not good.
August 2nd, 2009 at 9:41 pm
Andras,
I’ve seen the reviews and a lot of this depends on what you are used to. If you come from a lower resolution device like an eTrex or 60csx the Oregons (all of them not just the 550) are going to be harder to read. If you are already using another GPS with a high resolution display I think you’ll find that the 550t is very good in comparison.
-Scott
August 3rd, 2009 at 11:53 am
[...] Oregon Beta into Official 3.10 Release Aug.03, 2009 in Garmin Oregon Shortly after shipping the Oregon 550t Garmin has officially released the features introduced during the course a lengthy beta on the [...]
August 5th, 2009 at 11:56 am
Hi, I’m a very happy user of a Garmin Edge 305 (I use it on my mountain bike, with Heart Rate and Cadence Sensors). I’m looking forward to start geocaching and I’d like to have just one GPS for both.
I need :
- a good screen in direct sunlight (Edge doesn’t)
- record heart rate for future analysis (Edge does)
- display map (Edge doesn’t)
- replaceble batterys (Edge doesn’t)
- for geocaching don’t really know what I need
Think I dont need:
- Camera
Can anyone enlighten me on this? Does the 550 have what “I need”?
Best regards
UL
August 5th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Ulisses,
If you don’t need the camera I would suggest looking at either the Garmin Oregon 300/400t or the Dakota 20. All of these devices have identical (and very good) support for geocaching, so no real differences there. The primary different between the Oregon 400 and Dakota 20 is size, the Dakota is smaller, lighter and better on batteries. I don’t have an Edge so I can’t compare the Dakota and the Edge but the Dakota has the best bright sun visibility out of all of these devices, however, it still isn’t as good as some of the lower resolution devices like the 60csx or eTrex. The Dakota and Oregon meet all of your other criteria and should be compatible with the HRM and cadence sensor you already have.
August 6th, 2009 at 7:39 am
Hi Scott,
Thanks four your information. I’ll try to collect more info about those models.
My main doubt is the fact that Oregon’s (I don’t know about the other models you mencioned) record tracks on GPX format (doesn’t include information about heart rate nor Cadence) so, I don’t know if there is a way to have this info recorded along the track so that I can (at home) analyse my heart and legs “behaviour”.
Best regards
UL
August 6th, 2009 at 8:27 am
The Oregon and Dakota’s that support wireless interfaces (and hence the cadence and HRM) all put heart rate and cadence information into the GPX file as part of the track logs. This thread discusses some options for viewing that data:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/message/view/Fitness/12546557
August 6th, 2009 at 8:35 am
Well… I didn’t really read the wiki before asking : “The Oregon shows the sensor data in the configurable data fields on the map, compass and odometer page. The Cadence and Heart Rate data fields show instantaneous data from each of the sensors. There is no page on the Oregon which graphs the sensor data or allows you to view the history.
The Oregon also saves the sensor data in the tracklog (current.gpx) so that it can be analyzed by various programs that run on your computer.”
So I’ll be another Oregon user as soon as possible.
Best regards
UL
August 7th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
Scott,
My 550t shipped from Garmin yesterday and I have an expected delivery of Monday the 10th. Can’t wait to put it through it’s paces. I’m moving up from a Colorado 400t so I’m sure there will be a learning curve.
Ron…
August 11th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
WOW! I’m really impressed. I set my new 550t out in the back yard this morning next to my 60CSx. The weather was overcast and a lot of moisture in the air. The Oregon locked on almost immediately with an accuracy of 6 feet. The 60 took several minutes to get a WAAS lock and an accuracy of 21 feet. That seems almost too good to be true.
Ron…
August 11th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Ron,
What software is your new 550t running? I’m still seeing a lot of time to lock WAAS (esp. under cover).
-Scott
August 11th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Software: v2.10
GPS software: v3.40
August 13th, 2009 at 1:41 am
Hi Scott,
have you ever compared the accuracy of the 550 with the 60csx and eTrex? I have read in more than two reviews that the Oregon series a) lack accuracy (coordinates vs. display on map), b) take ~ 3 min to acquire the coordinates (some reviews pose the eTrex as ‘much’ faster), and c) are not very precise, in terms of the right coordinates in a <3 ft radius.
I need to geotag soil spots (say 10 x 10 in) that I will be sampling over time, in a place that changes drastically every season, so I need a device that is precise enough as to take me to the exact same spot, even when I am not able to recognize it after plants have re-shaped the landscape…
I am being clear enough? what is your experience in this regard? other reviewers: any advice?
Many thanks
August 13th, 2009 at 5:29 am
Hugo,
There isn’t a consumer GPS available today that will get you to within a 10″x10″ square every time. Most consumer GPS’s can get you to within about 20′-30′ pretty reliably. But there are some differences between GPSr’s in terms of accuracy and lock time.
The Oregon is very good for acquisition time, better than either the 60csx or eTrex and faster than any consumer GPS I’ve used if you use it every 3 days. Most of the time it will have lock by the time you can see the first screen. If you don’t use it every 3 days you’ll see performance which is still better than the 60csx and eTrex but only marginally better.
As for accuracy the Oregon and 60csx are going to be better than the eTrex and the the 60csx is still better than an Oregon. However Garmin has released some new firmware on the Oregon 400 (which I’m assuming will be released eventually on the 550) that seem to improve accuracy. The 60csx also supports an external antenna if you are really interested in squeezing out the last bit of accuracy. But again, we’re still talking about accuracy within a 20-30′ ring.
-Scott
August 13th, 2009 at 11:57 am
great information for newbes just getting started, thank you
August 13th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
HI again Scott and thanks for the quick reply…
I have a comment on accurac:
I have used an eTrex Legend (the lab’s GPS for everybody’s use) and compared it against a military-type GPS (with a huge antenna and certainly a lot bigger than any handheld GPS)… the eTrex was giving coordinates with two decimal digits. The military one had 4 decimal digits, but the first two were the same between both GPSs…
So, I guess that if the Oregon is more accurate than an eTrex, it should have a very decent accuracy.
But my question again: have you tested the accuracy of your 550? have you measured the same exact point on a regular basis and compared the variability?
Thanks again
August 14th, 2009 at 8:39 am
I tend to measure track reproducibility and accuracy against a reference track based on data I’ve recorded on a test track that I’ve walked several hundred times. The track is mostly in the woods with varying terrain so I feel it is a pretty test of GPS’s accuracy.
That test is much harder for a GPS than walking up to a known location under no tree cover, letting the GPS settle and taking a reading. Most GPS’s do pretty well with the spot test, few do well at the track test.
That said the Oregon 400 has improved with the most recent 3.13 beta release. I’m hoping those changes will make their way into the Oregon 550 soon. Still maybe not as good as the 60csx but getting closer.
August 24th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Is if possible to just buy the 550 model, then upload maps, state by state from the Nat. Geo. 7 1/2 min, state topo series?
August 24th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Unfortunately no. The 550 only works with Garmin 1:24k topo maps, 1:100K topo maps or the free maps like those found on http://gpsfiledepot.com
-Scott
September 1st, 2009 at 5:17 am
Hi Scott,
Excellent review.
Are you planning on doing a similar review on the dacota 10 and 20?
Would be much appreciated.
Ciao
September 1st, 2009 at 5:20 am
Ok just found it. Spelling mistake
(DaKota) Lol
September 13th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
I was thinking of getting the 550t for my atv. Do you think this would be a good one for atving? I go on alot of unmarked trails with other people and thought this unit would be good for mapping them so I don,t get lost if I go by myself. what do you think good unit or not?
September 14th, 2009 at 8:03 am
I don’t have any personal experience with ATV’ing but it seems that given the large touchscreen and waterproof design that the 550t would make an good choice of offroading. Do you need the camera? If not, I would consider the Oregon 300/400.
-Scott
September 14th, 2009 at 7:58 pm
Yes I think the camera would be nice; So I can take pictures of certain locations mark them with the gps and find my way back there next time I go. Thanks for your input.also i,m kinda new at this whole gps thing so maybe you know where I would find a mount for mounting a gps on a atv? and where would be the best place to buy the gps?
September 16th, 2009 at 7:59 am
I would suggest checking out the RAM mounts at GPSCity.com. They have a number of ATV mounts for the Oregon.
-Scott
September 20th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
Hi – I have a GPSMAP 76CS and am considering going to the 550t. I hike in the Sierras and Cascades in the summer and do some snowshoeing in the winter. The ‘76 is OK, but the display on the 550t looks awesome, as does that 3D compass. Am I going to see some big improvements by going to this unit?
September 20th, 2009 at 4:43 pm
The display resolution and detail will be much better than the 76CS. Unfortunately the brightness won’t be as good (it is a common issue with higher resolution displays). You’ll also notice much better reception and ability hold on to satellite lock. The 550t would be a nice step up for you since you are essentially moving up 2 generations of GPS.
September 20th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
Thanks for the quick reply, Scott! How about the 550t’s ability to see the satellites compared to the ‘76? One of the things I had hoped to use a GPS for was to have it while hiking and use it for the “track” feature. However, I quickly found out that it had to be out of my pocket to be of any use during the hike. If I had three hands, that would have been no problem! So, I got the Garmin external antenna and have been experimenting with having it strapped to the top of my day pack. Still didn’t work exactly as I had wanted, but at least the ‘76 was seeing the satellites all the way. Will the 550t help, or am I still going to need something connected to it, sticking to my day pack or hat?
Jim
September 20th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
550t will be much better than the 76cs in this respect. You’ll notice a big difference in GPS reception and sensitivity.
-Scott
September 22nd, 2009 at 8:35 am
Hi I’ve just bought a 550T with the Europe Topo Maps
i live in Scotland, & will be using the 550T to map out rivers & loch’s for fishing…
I would like to know one thing How is the 550T when in a car.. or under cover…etc.. plus battery life when being tracked how long will the unit go for before running dry???
Thx Matt
September 22nd, 2009 at 9:07 am
Matt,
The unit works well as an auto nav if you have good maps, normally I would suggest City Nav Europe. I’m not sure about the road detail on the European Topos. Make sure you upgrade to version 2.3 as soon as you get the unit, this will give you the best performance under cover. Battery life depends on what you doing with the unit but I typically get 8-12 hours on 2700mAh NiMH batteries. If you use the camera a lot, expect less. NiMN batteries and a good charger are a must.
Come check out the Oregon wiki if you have more questions: http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com
-Scott
September 22nd, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Thx Scott i have good nimn batts 2700 they are charging at the moment… i want to get GB Discoverer…?. I’m sure it has roads turn by turn..etc… oh.. i know this might sound daft but this is my first ever gps of any kind…?. does it give voice direction’s..etc… i cant see it lol just asking if i fit it to a car etc…but if not that’s ok… it will do what i want & more…
Thx Matt
September 22nd, 2009 at 3:29 pm
No voice directions on the 550t as it doesn’t have an external speaker — you just get beeps. GB Discoverer is supported on the 550t.
September 22nd, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Thx Scott do you know of any plans tto make inland maps for the uk? for fishing i see yous have a good few inland maps over there in the states
Thx matt
September 22nd, 2009 at 3:58 pm
Sorry, I’m not sure. It might be worth checking with the GarminUK team.
-Scott
September 23rd, 2009 at 2:19 am
Waiting for my 550t to arrive no sign as yet… lol
September 23rd, 2009 at 10:15 pm
Is this a proper venue to inquire about the topo map options for the 550t? I believe that it comes with a fairly detailed topo map for the US, but there is a 24k map for purchase that is a lot more detailed. If I purchase it will the install of the DVD clobber my US topo data, or can I load whichever I want to, as I currently do with the MapSource software and my ‘76CS? I doubt that I need anything other than CA, NV< OR, and WA – but one never knows…
Jim
September 23rd, 2009 at 10:56 pm
I guess what I may have been getting at in that last post is: should I simply get the 550 and not the 550t if I plan on hiking / snowshoeing in the four western states all the time? Will I loose ANY functionality by going with the lower priced model?
September 24th, 2009 at 8:55 am
The 550t comes with a 100k Topo for the entire US. It is similar to the Topo 2008 USA product which you can preview on Garmin’s web site.
You can purchase the 24k Topos and load them on the unit together with the preinstalled maps. You can then select which you want to view.
550 and 550t differences are discussed here:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/Product+Information#toc12
Come join us on the wiki if you have more questions!
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/message/list/home
-Scott
September 24th, 2009 at 11:43 am
Hi all i got my 550T & its brill… tracking is great even when there is no line of sight…?, i was in a massive warehouse near my home & sats where tracking me when i was shopping lol crazy stuff indeed…,
i want to download some free maps for this unit I’ve donea search on Google & i found one… how do you select it on the unit? if its on a sd micro card?
Thx Matt
September 24th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
All maps in either internal memory or SD card will show up under Setup>Map>Map Information . Enable the ones which you want visible.
-Scott
September 24th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Thx Scott, do you know of any good sites that i could get free maps from just now for the 550T
thx matt
September 24th, 2009 at 12:19 pm
http://gpsfiledepot.com
September 24th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
Except it looks like you are in the UK!
Try this:
http://gpsmapsearch.com/
or
http://mapcenter.cgpsmapper.com
September 24th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
Yup I’m in Scotland… Thx will try them out your a good help
Thx Scott
September 26th, 2009 at 1:05 am
Matt,
Now that you have the 550T, have you tried it in the car as an auto nav?
Am just wondering how easy it is to read whilst driving.
September 27th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
Yup ive tried it michael it is very good i must say… it beeps.. b4 a direction is needed to be taken & it is ok for reading?, yup i must say i will use this easy for in car sat/nav no probs there…? it does depend on what maps u use i must say I’m using the openworld map its ok but not brilliant i would advise you to use garmin maps i just hope when i get the map for the city that I’m in it will let me type in post codes etc… that would help ads for the moment I havent got that at hand.?, apart from that its tops.. switch it on 15secs later ive got it loaded in with 13 sat tracking my position fast as anything lol class in a glass as we would say over here in scotland… :-b
September 28th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Thx Matt for the auto nav confirmation. I am sure it is more logical to have a separate Nav system for the car, but these days I seem to carry around more and more gadgets.
If i can combine road and off road in one GPS, it can only be a plus.
September 29th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Well as i said i think the official road maps will be best for this unit?, it is class in a glass for in car use thats for sure you can see the directions no probs plus a friend who was driving today with me in the passenger seat could read it no probs & he is in his late 70’s lol yup thumbs up 10 out of 10
With the official city maps are cheap anyway & they will give you detailed maps & so on…
Thx matt
September 29th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
If you are looking for routable maps the Garmin maps are definitely the best way to go.
-Scott
September 30th, 2009 at 9:49 am
Scott when you update you 550T with a routable map say of the uk?, do you then get the option to type in the post code etc..
for searching etc…?, plus i have tried to find out tides info
on where i fish but it keep saying parameters are wrong etc…
I dont know how to use the tide option + water temp & the barometer how do i setup & use these lol i told you this was my first ever Gps lol :-b
Thx Matt
September 30th, 2009 at 9:57 am
Yes, routable maps have the ability to search by city, addresses, etc.
I’m not sure the tide data is available on the European 550t – I just read something (on the Oregon wiki I believe) that it was advertised but not supported.
Tides:
WhereTo?>Tide Stations . If you get an error you either don’t have maps installed with tide stations or your aren’t searching close enough to the ocean — you probably need to be within 100 miles, if not recenter your search closer to the ocean and search again.
Water temp requires an external NMEA sensor, if you have one installed this data field will work.
Barometer just needs to be calibrated to work. Calibrate the altimeter to a known elevation and you’ll be set. The altimeter should show your elevation change or you can swap to one of the barometric graphs to see air pressure.
September 30th, 2009 at 10:33 am
Thx Scott will try & get that NMEA sensor & get the water temp thingy working yup will setup the rest of the stuff above in time…?.
I will also get new maps for this unit do you know if i got city,coastal,inland water, maps would they all be able to run along side each other? along with my prelaoded Topo maps? because they would all be Garmin maps anyway?, just wondering lol :-b
Thx Matt
September 30th, 2009 at 10:33 am
sorry preloaded lol
October 1st, 2009 at 6:33 am
Garmin’s maps will all work together and with the preloaded maps. You won’t be able to see them at the same time but you can enable/disable each layer or setup profiles where you can pick which one is enabled.
October 4th, 2009 at 7:22 am
Is there anyway to also tag the direction of the photo, ie north south east west???
October 4th, 2009 at 8:26 am
The newest version of Oregon firmware (2.3) supports the ImgDirection tag. You’ll need to make sure the compass is calibrated. Discussion here:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/message/view/Camera/14802505
October 5th, 2009 at 7:26 am
How is the satellite reception on the 550t compared to a 60cxs? I’ve used both a Vista and a 60cs and when out hiking under tree cover or down in a canyon out in the desert Southwest, the reception often has been very poor.
Any thoughts?
October 5th, 2009 at 8:06 am
The 550t and the 60csx are going to be similar although I think most people would give the edge to the 60csx under the same conditions.
Both the 550t and 60csx will a significant improvement over the 60cs and Vista neither of which had high sensitivity receivers.
-Scott
October 5th, 2009 at 8:44 am
Thx Scott, that’s what I thought.
Bob
October 22nd, 2009 at 5:22 am
Oh.. Thx Scott for everything all the info will keep in touch thx :-b
October 26th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Your site is a great help. I live in Arkansas & don’t have a GPS unit for hiking or driving. I also fish in the local Corp lake. Will the 550T with additional maps be suitable for all three? (driving, hiking & boating)
Thanks
Paul
October 26th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
Absolutely. However you might want different maps for each of these activities depending on what you are willing to spend.
The 550t comes with built-in Topo maps which are great for hiking. If you want depth maps for the lakes you fish you’ll need to see if Garmin’s Inland Lakes maps cover the lakes you want — the topos will show you the shoreline of the lake but not the depth, markers, etc.
As for driving you’ll probably need to invest in Garmin City Navigator maps which work on the 550t. These maps support autorouting (routing along roads), the built in topo maps show the roads but you cannot route along them like a Nuvi or similar autonav unit.
-Scott
November 1st, 2009 at 5:55 pm
Scott
I might have missed it. Can you tell us more about ruggedness and whether the screen scratches?
November 5th, 2009 at 8:41 am
Rick,
The screen will scratch if you use it with dirty fingers. I always cover mine with a Zagg invisibleShield. You can find a link up near the top of this page. Highly recommended.
The touchscreen is a little less sensitive but after using it for a day I don’t notice the difference.
-Scott
November 7th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Can you upload more than one map per SD card? I want to use the topo and city maps but don’t want to keep changing SD cards. So if I get one big enough will the device support both?
November 7th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Dave,
Yes you can. I would recommend a 4GB card. You can load different maps onto the card as different files.
-Scott
November 19th, 2009 at 12:12 am
Well, I just picked up my 550t this afternoon. Asked the sales manager to demo it to me outside in the bright sun, before I bought. While it does loose some detail, it isn’t as bad as I thought it was going to be.
That was the good news. The bad news came after I got home and opened the box. I had planned on firing in a freshly-charged pair of batteries, going out on the back patio with the 550t and the manual, and getting familiar with how it worked. A huge foot came out of the box and kicked me in the gut – NO PRINTED MANUAL. WTF?????? A manual on a disk. Now how wonderful is that? Come on Garmin – put a damn manual in the box, even if you have to add $20 to the price of the unit. Or at least offer a manual for sale on the web site.
But no, I’m gonna have to sit here at the computer reading the “manual” or go out on the patio and fumble around with the 550t and no manual. NOT what I had in mind.
My old 76CS had a manual in the box and, silly me, I “assumed” a manual would be standard equipment with something as complex as this. I’m sure it is fairly easy to operate, but somewhere along the line, it appears to me that some bean counters evidently got a bit carried away with cost cutting measures.
OK, done venting. Am I the only one who is peeved about this lack of a manual? Or, am I Homer Simpson and just can’t find it?
November 19th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Jim, You are right and this is a common complaint. Hopefully you’ve found the quick reference manual and the Oregon wiki. We’re here to help!
-Scott
November 19th, 2009 at 7:37 pm
Hi Scott,
Yep, got the quick ref booklet and have joined the wiki. Now, all I have to do is to find some time to spend with the 550t!!! Trying to get our home ready to put on the market – FAR too many things to take care of!!!!!
November 19th, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Any idea how long this firmware update should take? Mine’s been sitting here for 20 minutes with a little box that says “Updating Software – Complete / Updating Firmware” I clicked Cancel and it griped at me that canceling would not be a good idea………..
November 20th, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Hi Scott,
Great review of the 550t, thank you!
I have just returned a 60Csx Garmin unit because I did not like the constant searching of the map. Furthermore on my Trans Alp mountain bike trip, the map would search and eventually made me believe to go right on a trail intersection. After descending 100 vertical meters, the map would all of a sudden turn and tell me to turn around so I can get back on my routing. This happened too many times and I lost trust in the units proper guidance. When driving with my car (Garmin City Navigator Map), the unit would guide me on the road and keep moving on the Map while I had stopped at a red light, eventually it would zoom back to my actual position, it would also give me turn instructions too late – very frustrating. All in all the 60 Csx seemed confused too many times!
I am longing for handheld GPS which is spot on, knows where it is quickly, makes up its mind how the map should be positioned relative to the direction the GPS is held in my hand or on the mountain bike which will allow me to confidently turn onto the right trail or road without having to worry that I will have to turn around again. Also I like the compass to show me the true direction without searching left and right.
Will the 550t replicate what my 60Csx did or is it going to perform as I just mentioned on my wish list??? Is it similar in performance with a street unit I have the Garmin 770 and it is flawless and spot on.
Thank in advance.
November 21st, 2009 at 8:32 am
I’m surprised that you’ve had so many issues with the 60csx. Normally I wouldn’t expect behavior like this on either the 60csx or Oregon. It might be worth trying another 60csx or the Oregon.
-Scott
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:35 pm
Hi Scott,
Thanks for all of the information. I’m a geocacher and have used a 60csx for a couple of years and am very happy with it.
I’m interested in the Oregon 550 or 550T for geocaching since I won’t have to carry a separate camera and my PocketPC that had all of the cache gpx data in CacheMate. I have maps from City Navigator North America 2009, BlueChart Americas v9.0, and US Topo loaded on the 60csx via Mapsource.
I want TOPO and City Navigator maps on the 550/550T. I suspect that CN2009 is too old for the 550/550T and US Topo from Garmin is really old (purchased 3-4 years ago).
I’m not sure if I should just purchase the 550 and the TOPO U.S. 100K on DVD plus City Navigator North America NT on DVD or buy the 550T and only purchase the City Navigator North America NT on DVD. Either way I go, the total price should be roughly the same since I purchase two maps for the 550 or 1 map for the 550T. Can you give me compelling reasons which way to go with my purchases? Thanks!
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Chris,
The older Topo’s will run fine on the 550 and you don’t need a new license to try them. You might want to see if this is good enough or whether you want to spend the money. CN2009 will probably work on the 550t but you’ll need to purchase a new license to use it on another device and you’ll probably want to get the NT version as well.
The biggest difference between the two options above is described in quite a bit of detail here:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/Product+Information#toc12
-Scott
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Hi Scott,
I was thoroughly impressed with your review! Thank you so much for your detail. I was researching info on purchasing the 550t and I think I’ve made my decision based on your comments.
Thank you,
Cheryl
December 21st, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Does the 550T have sound alerts? My 60csx alerts me when I am arriving at a cache.
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Hello,
Just one question that i cannot find at specs.
It says it accepts microSD card, but, how big? I like having all my maps into the gps so that i don’t have to load them from Pc everytime i go out.
thanks in advance
Antonio
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:29 pm
Definitely 4GB, and many people report success with 8GB and 16GB. Keep in mind the per file limit is 4GB and there is also a segment limit of 4000 segments across all loaded maps which may impact your ability to load more data before you hit the max file/card size.
-Scott
December 28th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
Hi Scott. Thanks for your in-depth review. I live in Costa Rica, and guess what, I will be using the 550 for hiking. I have two questions. First, I would like to know how the screen really performs in the outdoors. There are a lot of bad (and very bad) reviews on this issue. I would like to hear a more extensive opinion on this matter. And second, can you provide a link to a page where I can get a good Costa Rica map. Thanks
December 30th, 2009 at 1:08 am
I’m a long time hiker/backpacker who finally went ‘techie’ after endless pressure from worrisome family and friends. I bought my 550T three months ago and now I wouldn’t be without it. I find the item very user friendly and easy to operate. The geotagged photos are such a bonus — showing the photo at the exact spot on the track. I’ve been busy tracking all my favorite hiking locations and sharing them with pals. I also wish I had a printed manual with it but a CD version works too.
January 10th, 2010 at 2:49 am
I will like to known if GPS model 500T includes Puerto Rico maps.
January 10th, 2010 at 7:54 am
Yes. I was just in PR last week and the built in topos have coverage for the entire island.
-Scott
January 22nd, 2010 at 5:02 pm
Scott, thanks for the great review. I am a field scientist and have a Garmin 12. I think it is time to upgrade, but I can wait a bit longer. You mentioned that you were hopeful that there would be a different chipset. Do you think garmin will be replacing the chipset in this line of handhelds?
Keep up the good work!
January 22nd, 2010 at 5:09 pm
Wow a 12 ! I have one of those too (although I have 6-8 GPS’s in between too!).
Hard to say about the chipset. Garmin just introduced the Oregon 450t and I’m sure that has the same chipset as the 550. The soonest would probably be later in the year.
-Scott
January 25th, 2010 at 2:57 pm
Hello Scott, great review. I also have a 12 and several other handheld’s. I just lost my 60CSX and need to replace it. I was going to buy the same thing as It was great. I have been reading up on the Colorado and Oregon and as they have changed so much from the 60, I am need some help deciding. I use my GPS at work as a police officer, locating drug grows to finding lost hunters. I hunt, fish, rockclimb, hike, camp, ATVing, teach navigation and outdoor survival(basically everything). I live in Canada and need a rugged unit with high powered GPS, waterproof and a leach so that I stop loosing them. I had a touch screen phone and switched to a Blackberry w/ a roller ball. I liked the touch better on a phone but not sure if it is tough enough for a GPS.Thanks,
Russ
January 25th, 2010 at 5:30 pm
Russ,
The Oregon is much more rugged than a typical touchscreen phone. I have a Droid and it is “fragile” compared to the Oregon 550t. You’ll definitely want a screen protector like an invisibleshield to help prevent scratches. I use my 550t outdoors almost everyday in all types of weather and it looks like new after 9 months. I have very high praise for the Oregon in this department.
-Scott
January 26th, 2010 at 5:09 am
Thanks Scott. I think I will be ordering one as it looks like it has everything I need. The only thing I was worried about was the touch screen and you have alleviated that. One more stupid question. Everyone talks about loading different maps, On my 60csx I loaded the TOPO and the steet maps. I remember reading something in the manual about only reading the last one that is loaded. I never did figure out a way to switch from one to the other. Or does it blend the two. As I come out of the woods and contour lines, does it start showing the major routes as a Car GPS? Or is there a menu to switch from one to the other? Thanks again,
Russ
January 26th, 2010 at 9:25 am
Russ,
Like the 60csx there is a way to switch back and forth. However the Oregon adds something called profiles which makes maps switching much easier. In each profile (ie. Hiking, Automotive) you can select which maps are visible for that activity. Once it is setup it is very simple to swap profiles and hence your maps and other settings.
There are certain types of maps that can be blended. Most Garmin maps are not blended with the exception of relief shading which will show up on any map (ie. City Navigator road maps) if you have your topos enabled. There are some transparent 3rd party maps and Garmin’s custom maps feature which allow you to blend. And Garmin’s new BirdEye aerial imagery has the ability to do some blending with the built in vector maps.
-Scott
February 4th, 2010 at 9:34 am
Scott,
Note that when a geocache is downloaded from geocaching.com to the Oregon 550t with 2.7 software, the cache hints are not loaded. The device message indicates “Hints available to premium members only”. There has been no indication anywhere online or in the Garmin literature that says this. In fact, all the info I have read online seems to indicate the opposite, such as:
“Find Fun
Oregon 550t supports Geocaching.com GPX files for downloading geocaches and details straight to your unit. By going paperless, you’re not only helping the environment but also improving efficiency. Oregon stores and displays key information, including location, terrain, difficulty, hints and descriptions, which means no more manually entering coordinates and paper print outs! Simply upload the GPX file to your unit and start hunting for caches…”
Garmin has confirmed this.
Thanks,
Carol
February 4th, 2010 at 10:33 am
That is correct. In order to see the details of each cache you need to be a premium member. That is covered in the wiki here:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/geocaching
-Scott
February 13th, 2010 at 11:12 pm
In the article above you said, “I uploaded a geotagged picture from Picasa/Google Earth and it was recognized by the Oregon 550t and located properly on the map.” How did you do it? I have been unable to get a geotagged photo from my PC into my 550t. It seems that BaseCamp will not do it (just the waypoint).
February 15th, 2010 at 9:51 am
Gregg,
I was able to export the geotagged photo from Picasa to the /Garmin/JPEG directory on my connected GPS and it showed up on the map.
-Scott
February 18th, 2010 at 12:51 pm
Hi, I had pretty much decided on buying the 550t until I checked the specs on the Garmin web site. It says that it does not have tide tables although on just about every site that sells it they say that it is supported. Can anyone confirm whether or not this is supported on the UK/European version?
Thanks!
February 18th, 2010 at 1:13 pm
Roddy, I think you are correct but I only have the US version which does have tide stations. I’m sure I’ve seen this mentioned but I can’t find it right now. I would suggest you post your question on the Oregon wiki, there are a fair number of UK Oregon owners over there who can probably answer your question.
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/message/list/home
-Scott
February 18th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
Thank you very much Scott for the speedy response, I’ll give that a try.
February 23rd, 2010 at 9:47 am
scott is there a way to get my geocaches on the 550, entered as waypoints thanks
February 23rd, 2010 at 10:36 am
Yes, here’s the link to the wiki FAQ:
http://garminoregon.wikispaces.com/Geocaching#toc18
February 26th, 2010 at 2:06 am
Hi All,
I was very excited to purchase an Oregon 450T to replace my Vista HCX. The excitement went down when the unit repeat ably could not identify where it was, quite worrying for a GPS unit. Of course, the day is very cloudy and I was inside the house (it’s cold out in Montreal in Feb). I changed the batteries to put new Alkaline instead of the rechargeable I am using in the HCx. I put the unit outside and it eventually catch enough satellite signals to find where it was. My old HCx could find it’s way right away beside the new unit, while the Oregon could not.
So, is it normal for the “first” positioning to be more difficult? Could my wireless network interfere more with the new Oregon? Does the Oregon need a lot more power for its antenna to work properly? Will I need to bring two GPS or a ton of batteries? I will test it out outdoor for 4 days so I hope it will work! Please let me know if I can improve the reception a way or another?
Thanks,
David
February 26th, 2010 at 8:43 am
David,
When you first get a new GPS you should let it sit outside with a clear view of the sky for 20-30 minutes. This allows to build some internal databases that it can use later to make signal acquisition faster. You will probably want to invest in 4-8 2700mAh AA NiMH batteries and charger for the the 550t. It is more power hungry than the Vista, but you still can get 10-12 hrs of use on a pair of well charged NiMH batteries.
-Scott
March 1st, 2010 at 12:19 pm
I am considering one of the Oregon units, probably the 550T. I want to use it not only for hiking but also for kayaking on both inland as well as coastal waters. I see several different maps available for the units but am not sure which I should purchase.
Thanks,
Roy
March 1st, 2010 at 12:38 pm
Roy, Let us know where you’ll use the GPS most frequently and for what kind of activities (hiking, driving, kayaking, geocaching, etc) and I can make some suggestions.
-Scott
March 1st, 2010 at 2:04 pm
Driving would be minimum. I intend to use it mostly for hiking and kayaking in the coastal waterways on Long Island as well as rivers and lakes upstate New York. As far as hiking I would be using it on Long Island and again upstate New York.
Thanks again,
Roy
March 1st, 2010 at 2:40 pm
Roy,
For driving the only real option you have is Garmin’s City Navigator maps. They provide turn-by-turn directions while you are driving similar to an auto GPS except you don’t get verbal commands — just beeps for upcoming turns. This runs about $70-$90.
For your outdoor activities I would suggest trying some of the free maps at http://gpsfiledepot.com . If you get the 550t the built in topos would cover you for hiking and they might be good enough for kayaking although if you want Marine data (depth, etc) you’ll need to go for Garmin’s BlueCharts.
March 1st, 2010 at 2:44 pm
Thanks for your advice Scott. I wasn’t aware of the filedepot website, I’ll give it a try.
Roy
March 6th, 2010 at 11:51 am
Hi All,
Scott, thank you for answering my Feb 26 post.
I just came back from 5 days outdoor cross country ski trip. I used my new Oregon 550T and a friend of mine had his Vista Csx. As far as the reception or positioning goes, the oregon was perfect, despite my initial fear on day one trying to get a position. As far as batteries are concerned, I used a mix of rechargeable 2500mAh (with good results), rechargeable 1700 MAh, with expectably much lower results as well as alkaline 1,5V, with good GPS results (but unacceptable from an environmental point of view, with two batteries out every two days of use). So thanks for the advice, I will look for these rechargeable NiMH batteries, and prices will go down if more of us do!
Enjoy the outdoor!
David